Merchant Cash Advances

Understanding MCAs—fast funding with steep costs and significant risks.

Published December 30, 2025 ET

Intro

A Merchant Cash Advance (MCA) is a type of short-term business financing where a lender provides a lump-sum payment in exchange for a portion of your future credit card sales or daily bank deposits, plus a fee. It's not technically a loan but a sale of future receivables, which allows it to bypass traditional lending regulations like usury laws.

MCAs originated in the 1990s as a quick funding option for small businesses with high credit card transaction volumes—retailers, restaurants, e-commerce brands. They've grown with fintech platforms and are often marketed as flexible alternatives to traditional loans. But they can carry high costs and risks that make them a last-resort option for most businesses.

Key Components of an MCA

Advance Amount

The lump-sum cash provided upfront, typically $5,000 to $500,000, based on your average monthly credit card or bank deposit revenue (often 1–2x monthly sales).

Factor Rate

A multiplier (e.g., 1.1x to 1.5x) applied to the advance to determine total repayment. For a $100,000 advance at 1.2x, you'd repay $120,000.

Important: This isn't an interest rate but a fixed cost, making effective APRs hard to calculate and often very high.

Holdback/Remittance Percentage

The portion of daily or weekly sales (e.g., 10–20%) automatically deducted until the total is repaid. If daily sales are $1,000 at 15% holdback, $150 is remitted each day.

Repayment Term

No fixed term—it depends on sales volume. Strong sales mean faster repayment (3–6 months); slow sales extend it (up to 12–18 months or more).

Fees

Additional charges may include:

  • Origination fees (1–5% of advance)
  • ACH setup fees
  • Stacking fees if multiple MCAs are taken

How MCAs Work: Step-by-Step

1. Application

Submit business details: bank statements, credit card processing history (3–6 months), and revenue data. Approval is based on sales volume, not credit score (though personal credit may be checked). Process is fast—often same-day or within 24–48 hours.

2. Underwriting and Offer

Lender reviews daily/weekly sales to determine advance amount, factor rate, and holdback percentage. No collateral required, but a UCC lien on business assets or personal guarantee may be needed.

3. Funding

Funds are deposited into your business account, minus any upfront fees.

4. Repayment

Automatic deductions from credit card processor (split remittances) or bank account (ACH withdrawals) based on the holdback percentage. Continues until full repayment (advance + factor rate premium).

5. Completion or Renewal

Once repaid, the MCA ends. Lenders often offer renewals or additional advances based on performance—this is where the debt stacking risk begins.

Eligibility Requirements

  • Business in operation for at least 3–6 months
  • Minimum monthly revenue (e.g., $10,000+ in credit card sales or deposits)
  • No strict credit score minimum (FICO as low as 500), but consistent sales are key
  • Not available in some states due to regulations (e.g., restrictions in New York or California)

Pros of MCAs

Speed and Accessibility: Quick approval and funding, ideal for emergencies or cash flow gaps. No collateral or strong credit needed.

Flexible Repayments: Payments adjust with sales—no fixed amounts. Lower sales mean smaller deductions.

No Equity Dilution: Doesn't require giving up ownership, unlike venture capital.

Use for Any Purpose: Funds can cover inventory, marketing, or payroll without restrictions.

Cons of MCAs

High Costs: Factor rates translate to effective APRs of 50–150%+. Stacking multiple MCAs can lead to debt spirals.

Cash Flow Strain: Daily/weekly deductions reduce available cash, especially during slow periods, potentially harming operations.

Lack of Regulation: Structured as receivable sales, not loans, so no interest rate caps. Some lenders use aggressive collection tactics or confessions of judgment.

Risk of Over-Leverage: Easy renewals encourage borrowing more, leading to cycles of debt similar to the RBF trap.

Not Ideal for Long-Term: Best for short-term needs. Unsuitable for low-margin or seasonal businesses.

Example Scenario

A restaurant with $50,000 monthly credit card sales needs $40,000 for renovations.

An MCA lender offers:

  • $40,000 advance
  • 1.3x factor rate ($52,000 total repayment)
  • 15% daily holdback

Daily sales average $1,667, so ~$250 is deducted daily.

  • If sales are strong: Repaid in ~4 months. Effective APR around 70%.
  • If sales are slow: Takes 8+ months. Same total cost, but longer cash flow strain.

Legal and Regulatory Aspects

Not a Loan: Classified as a purchase of future sales, avoiding state usury laws (interest caps).

Recent Regulations: As of 2025, states like New York require APR disclosures. Federal scrutiny via CFPB for abusive practices is increasing.

Potential Pitfalls: Contracts may include "stacking bans" or daily reconciliation requirements. Defaults can lead to lawsuits or asset seizures.

MCAs vs Other Financing

Aspect MCA RBF ABL
Collateral None (future sales) None (revenue) AR/Inventory
Speed Same-day possible Days to weeks Weeks
Cost 50–150%+ APR 20–50% APR High single to mid-teens %
Best for Emergency cash Growth capital Working capital
Risk High (debt stacking) High (over-leverage) Lower (asset-backed)

When to Consider an MCA

  • Last resort for urgent needs when other options aren't available
  • Short-term, one-time funding needs
  • Businesses with strong, consistent daily sales
  • When you have a clear, time-bound use for the funds

When to Avoid MCAs

  • If you're already carrying debt
  • Seasonal businesses with unpredictable sales
  • Low-margin businesses where daily deductions hurt operations
  • Any time you'd need to stack MCAs to survive

The Bottom Line

MCAs provide fast cash with sales-based repayments but at a steep price. They're suitable only for businesses with strong, consistent sales and a clear, short-term need. Always calculate effective costs and review contracts carefully to avoid traps.

If you find yourself considering an MCA, it's worth asking: Is there a better option I haven't explored? In most cases, the answer is yes.